![]() I think the time is past due to promote Krita as a photo editing tool. What I don’t understand under these circumstances is why Krita’s website bills the software entirely as a digital painting tool? There are entire youtube series’ dedicated to using Krita for photo editing I’ve been using it professionally for ages, and yet the Krita team seems to solely think of it as a painting tool. ![]() The single competent FLOSS alternative on GNU/Linux is literally named an ableist slur, and its interface is leagues behind Krita. It has all the tools you need, and what it lacks compared to Adobe is mostly cruft - bunk like generative AI tools that most professionals don’t need. They offer similar functionality at a much lower price point, and some are even free for non-commercial use. This is where Adobe Illustrator alternatives come into play. I settled on Krita for photo editing it works really well for this use case. While Adobe Illustrator is undoubtedly a top-notch software, its monthly subscription cost (20.99 per month) can be quite expensive for freelancers or small businesses. ![]() A few years ago now, I switched my design workflow over to 100% FLOSS tools. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |